“I support these things.”

Easy Waters, “One Day in the Life of a Jailhouse Lawyer,” Conundrums: Stories of Law & Justice

How far can solidarity reach from a prison cell?

In “One Day in the Life of a Jailhouse Lawyer,” mail call brings E the usual assortment: appeals, notices, and a personal letter. Among the envelopes is an appeal concerning Tibet. He reads it and decides to send a couple of dollars.

“I support these things.”

The declaration is casual. The circumstances give it weight. E is in prison, working for wages the story places at $7.75 a week. A couple of dollars has a different meaning when that is the income from which it comes.

He gives anyway.

The moment unsettles an easy division between the people who help and the people who need help. E has spent the day helping others read legal decisions. Now he considers suffering in another part of the world and chooses to contribute. His confinement has not confined the reach of his concern.

The envelope carries another irony. The appeal’s warning about imprisonment and torture has attracted scrutiny within the prison’s own mail process. Before the message can reach E, it must pass through institutional inspection. A call to oppose repression arrives through a system that controls what he can receive.

He reads it, considers it, and plans to place the enclosed flag decal on a folder. The world has entered the cell through the mail. He finds a small way to answer.

But generosity does not make him an uncritical reader.

Another appeal comes from Amnesty International. E describes having written to the organization twice, arguing that its categories should encompass people in the United States whom he understands as casualties of the wars on crime and drugs. In the narrative, neither letter receives a response.

Still, he plans to donate.

This is the conundrum: he supports the work while questioning the boundary of its recognition. He sees value in the cause and a problem in the terms through which the cause identifies whose suffering belongs within it.

The passage does not ask us to settle every argument in his letters. It asks us to hear a person making one. E is reading an organization’s public language against his own experience. He wants that experience considered, and he takes the trouble to write.

For advocacy organizations, that is a demanding kind of correspondence. It comes from someone who may appear in a fundraising record as a very small donor but who has something substantial to say about the mission. An adequate response requires attention to the argument as well as appreciation for the gift.

Categories can organize work. They also establish boundaries. A definition that helps an organization explain its purpose can leave someone else struggling to explain why their experience should matter to it. That tension deserves a conversation.

The story makes the silence especially sharp because E remains engaged. He does not withdraw his concern for people elsewhere simply because he feels unheard. His criticism accompanies his support. The relationship he seeks has room for both.

Those of us who work in nonprofits should recognize the challenge. Listening cannot depend on the size of a contribution or on whether the correspondent uses the language we expect. A letter from prison may contain an insight into the exclusions our familiar categories have made difficult to see.

There is also a lesson here about how we describe people in prison. A person can need assistance, offer it, criticize an institution, and support a cause in the same afternoon. These activities belong to a full human life. The institutional designation captures little of that life.

E’s few dollars cannot tell us what the campaign will accomplish. They tell us something about the person sending them: he regards suffering beyond his immediate circumstances as a claim on his attention.

He asks that the attention travel in both directions.

The envelopes have reached him. He will answer with a contribution and, when necessary, an argument. His solidarity crosses the wall. The question is whether recognition can make the return journey.

Join the Conversation

How can advocacy organizations make room for the people their categories leave out?

About the Conundrums Quotations Project

CQ-045 explores a quotation from “One Day in the Life of a Jailhouse Lawyer,” in Easy Waters’s Conundrums: Stories of Law & Justice. The project reads individual lines closely to examine the larger questions of law, justice, memory, and the human spirit they open.

Justice, Literature & Memory — Delivered to Your Inbox

Essays from the archive and new writing on race, literature, history, incarceration, freedom, and the American criminal legal system.